29th July 2010  Features

Killing in the Name

21st February 2010
Luke Catterson

Rate this story

It's Pants
It Rocks My Socks

More by Luke Catterson

One writer explores the furore surrounding the race for the Christmas Number One.

I never bought into the hype of getting Rage Against The Machine to the Christmas Number One and find the joy people have taken from it to be embarrassing. What exactly has this ‘great victory’ achieved? Is this going to make the charts a cultural significance again? Is it going to encourage people to actually buy music? I wouldn’t have thought so. What it does prove is that we can all come together to ruin things we don’t care about for people who do, while spectacularly missing the original target.

It is hardly a secret that RATM are on the Record label Sony, and as such, their record sales lead to profit for Simon Cowell. Joe McElderry sold 451,000 copies in the first week whereas RATM sold 503,000. If we compare this to the last male winner of X Factor, Leon Jackson (not a dissimilar artist to McElderry) who sold just 275,000 in the first week, then that is an increase of roughly 679,000 records for Cowell’s company. So it was very much in Cowell’s interest for this ‘competition’ to drive sales by over 150%. He also doesn’t see the Christmas number one slot as vitally important as evident by the fact he delayed the 2004 X Factor single to let that horrific Band Aid rehash get to number one. So the result of this ‘victory’ over Cowell has been both a hindrance and an advantage for him.

Even people who don’t like X Factor generally consider Joe a nice bloke. His life has changed and his dreams have come true. Only the deeply cynical would begrudge that to anybody who seems deserving. It may not last that long, and having the Christmas number one would cap an amazing few months for him and his family, to remember forever. Still, wouldn’t it be funny if we got a song with swearing in it to Number One even though we won’t care come Boxing Day and he’ll have to wonder why the country seems to have ganged up on him?

Then we have the frankly ridiculous (so much so it’s barely worth mentioning) irony of people being told through the Internet to buy "Killing in the Name" because ‘it has the lyrics, "F**k you I won’t do what you tell me" in it.’ If this is about challenging commercial success over artistic integrity then why not get an unknown, unsigned band to number one? That would surely send a better, less financially lucrative message to Cowell.

To sum up my feelings in a clumsy analogy - people have essentially paid Simon Cowell for the chance to kick over Joe McElderry’s sandcastle, mistaking it for Cowell’s, while Cowell sits in his real castle that was part funded by the fees paid to kick over little Joe’s sandcastle. High fives all round.

If we want to annoy Cowell next year I suggest we ring his doorbell and run away having left a big pile of cash on the doorstep.



christmas,kick,number,cowell,one,sold


Blog Widget by LinkWithin