Film: Sherlock Holmes
About this film
| Title | Sherlock Holmes |
|---|---|
| Director | Guy Ritchie |
| Release Date | 26 December 2009 |
| Certificate | |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Crime, Mystery, Thriller |
| Our Rating | /5.0 |
![]() Shown at Union Films Thursday 22nd April 2010 7:00pm | |
Rate this story
Related Articles
- Jun 10 - Iron Man 2
- Dec 08 - Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law
- Dec 06 - Breaking And Entering
- Nov 06 - Thank You For Smoking
- Nov 05 - Revolver
More by Amy Steadman
- May 10 - Shutter Island
- Apr 10 - Film: Up In The Air
- Oct 09 - Film Review: 500 Days of Summer
Whilst many ‘hard-core’ fans of the tales of the private detective huffed and puffed at the very idea of the Ritchie-Downey Jnr combination, I on the other hand rushed to the cinema and was delighted at the fresh reinvention of this old and dusty cinematic relic. And in answer to those ‘hard-core-Holmes-fans’: Yes! Your British icon has been subjected to a certain amount of Hollywood magic dust, but the result is a witty, charming and thoroughly entertaining film.
It’s London in the 1890s and a series of ritual murders by Lord Blackwood (Mark Strong) and his secret society has caught the attention of private detective Sherlock Holmes (Robert Downey Jr.) and his partner John Watson (Jude Law). In an attempt to foil Blackwood’s plan to take over England, Holmes and Watson run into the traditional scuffles they seem inherently predisposed to. Such ‘scuffles’ are subjected to Ritchie’s gritty edge; one slow-motion fight scene in particular is incredibly familiar (replace the banjo with The Stranglers Golden Brown and you’ve basically got Snatch). However, this style works perfectly, and, infused with a rough raucous energy, the film feels more faithful to the Arthur Conan Doyle tales than some of the more cerebral and dry adaptations we have seen previously.
This Ritchie’esque asperity in the film is perfectly balanced by Downey Jr’s charm and wit. This is a superb piece of casting. Downey Jr injects the character with a modern edge, whilst still pertaining to most of his original qualities. His portrayal of Holmes thus encapsulates a brilliant concoction of edginess, intellectuality and sardonic humour. Law too puts in a fantastic performance; a real punch back to all those tabloids that have slated his abilities. He is enthralling in his own right, but also provides an excellent straight-man and plain speaker to Holmes’s eccentricities. The relationship between the two is marvellous. They fight and bicker like an old-married couple. Downey Jr. and Law provide an electric on-screen chemistry, which has been missing from many recent family blockbusters.
My only criticism lies with the editing down of Rachel McAdams’s character Irene Adler. McAdams is wonderfully alluring in her portrayal of both Adler’s duplicity and charm. It is such a shame that we are not shown more of her mysterious previous relationship with Holmes, as it could have provided more of the sexual intrigue that is so brilliant, but merely hinted at in the film.
Despite this minor flaw, Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes is charming, stylish, witty and really quite… Elementary.Share this story
filmrevs,food,law,watson,ritchie,holmes,downey,sherlock


