Please, Don’t Mention the War

1


WAR PICFeminism. Freedom. Hitler. Banana. Spot the odd one out? Hint, it’s the one not commonly used in conversations involving feminism. A lot of terms are thrown around amongst feminist discussion. ‘Intersectionality’ and its importance is one. Fair enough. ‘Freedom’ is another, okay sure. ‘Nazis’. You’ve lost me. ‘Hitler’. Are we having the same conversation here?

For some time feminists have been given the charming name ‘Feminazis’  due to the opinions held by some, but let me stress not ALL, feminists on regulations on everything used to objectify a person. Porn, stripping, prostitution and most recently lads mags have all been subject to feminist scrutiny and with good cause, seeing as they can contribute to rape culture, (which obviously does not make a non-rapist into a rapist, but allows for rape apology and a skewed sense of the value of a person’s body). However there are also feminists who have fought for these very forms of expression, as a part of a progressive and empowered society, which does not slut-shame. Either way, these are topics worthy of discussion.

On the other hand radical feminists, who sure do not share the ‘empowerment’ view, have come to the party, albeit a little late, and are singing to the tune of the anti-feminists as soon as the ‘Hitler’ song comes on. Ah, that old classic. Except the second verse of their version goes something like ‘you won’t let us spout anti-Islamic, transphobic statements in front of your diverse range of members including trans* people and Muslims? You’re such fascists! Ohh la la.’

As somebody of German ancestry, whose family were actually in Germany during the Second World War and of which a large part still reside there, this argument is one of the only things which breaks my diplomatic barrier and hits hard. Differences of opinions happen and I consider feminism, although it has its flaws of course, to be a diverse group of people with every member as unique and as valuable as the next, a movement of which I am proud to be a part of. To associate it with such a dreadful time is inaccurate, incredibly insulting to and ignorant of the horror suffered by victims of the Nazi regime. To use this term in connection with a movement whose purpose is equal rights focused is trivialising. 

To associate feminism with such a dreadful time is inaccurate, incredibly insulting to and ignorant of the horror suffered by victims of the Nazi regime. To use this term in connection with a movement whose purpose is equal rights focused is trivialising.

On top of all of this, as soon as somebody pipes up that perhaps lads mags are vile and suggests that we could respectfully stop selling pieces of paper containing potentially triggering statements claiming that consent is not all that essential, that ‘no’ means ‘I’m playing hard to get, please assault me’ and more of the same delightful material, the old ‘our grandfathers’ argument comes up. It goes something like this: ‘Those awful feminists are trying to get rid of the freedoms, that OUR GRANDFATHERS fought and died for.’ Now let me stop you right there, person who hasn’t done any kind of research on the matter and whose opinions are limited to the simplicity of what ‘freedom’ means in the most basic of terms grasped when you are five years old. There are so many things wrong with that argument.

Firstly the generalisation ‘our grandfathers’, which of course excludes anybody not of British heritage, or from countries of other Allied forces. Secondly, the idea that ‘freedom’ is as simple as ‘do what you want’ is at the best, naïve, at the worst, dangerous. But of course, I missed the history lesson on the ‘Battle of Lads Mags’ fighting for the freedom of the granddaughters of today to take their clothes off and their grandchildren to sell images of them next to words such as ‘look at Rosie’s great big melons, her mouth says no but her eyes say ‘yes’!’  It’s a fair enough argument if you say, want to fight against fascism, but not when raising the very real concern that sexual harassment is ever present, that rape apologists and slut-shaming influence the justice a rape victim can get and that society can still be backwards enough to judge a women purely based on her looks or outfit choices (see the ‘women’s’ section of the Mail online or the abuse women in academia experience at certain debating events).

It’s a fair enough argument if you say, want to fight against fascism, but not when raising the very real concern that sexual harassment is ever present, that rape apologists and slut-shaming influence the justice a rape victim can get and that society can still be backwards enough to judge a women purely based on her looks or outfit choices.

On top of this, this statement is symptomatic of a very simplified view of us ‘heroes’ and them ‘villains’ and just looks at one side of the story, when the story is so much more complex. The concept of freedom is also more than complex and to put it simply, the freedom one person enjoys can seriously shrink the freedom of another. For example the freedom of one person to sexually harass or objectify one woman can have a serious impact on said woman’s freedom to enjoy her rights as well.

Furthermore, there is more than just freedom ‘to’, but freedom ‘from’ as well.  ‘Our grandfathers’ fought for freedom ‘to’ indeed, but also freedom ‘from’: freedom from discrimination, freedom from strict gender roles, freedom from a society in which a certain elite, in the minority, enjoy an unlimited amount of privilege while others are pushed into the mud. Just as feminism today fights for freedom from discrimination, from gender roles and the rest.

So while enjoying our own lovely freedoms, we do need to remember to respect other people’s sphere of liberty and see how what we do impacts on others. On top of this, perhaps we also need to learn to remember that those against lads mags are simply taking advantage of their freedom of expression and opinion in order to express their own opinion and see who is affected by the same issues.

Maybe we also need to remember the fight of those who also risked their lives over the past hundred years or so in order to gain equal rights. No, it’s no World War Two, but it’s worth taking up at least a tiny portion of our consciousness when we are scrabbling around for a good analogy to enhance our argument. Be for lads mags, be against them, but perhaps we need to respect one another’s freedom to debate the topic in a safe and secure space once in a while and take heed of the advice drilled into the heads of, for example, humanities students: Stop repeating yourself and come up with an original argument for once.

More articles in 21st Century Feminist
  1. Fleshing Out the Bones of Society
  2. Finally, A Car Made For Me, A Woman!
  3. The Telegraph Just Tried To Disguise Islamophobia With Feminism
  4. Does International Women’s Day Benefit Feminism?
  5. White Feminism : The Lack of Intersectionality Within Mainstream Feminism
  6. What I Talk About When I Talk About Men’s Feminism
  7. The ‘HeForShe’ Campaign: One Year On
  8. When Will the Media Treat Women With Respect?
  9. Vaginal Piercings to be Classified as a Form of Female Genital Mutilation
  10. Easy Ways To Take Feminist Action
  11. #50Dollarsnot50Shades: Porn From The Wrong Place
  12. Feminism Doesn’t Need A Rebrand
  13. Students Must Stand Up to Sexual Assault
  14. What does ‘Body Positivity’ really mean?
  15. Have You Seen Her? Where Are Women Going after University?
  16. Please, Don’t Mention the War
  17. I Clean, Therefore I Am
  18. 2014: The year of the feminist?
  19. Don’t ‘man up’, man your language
  20. White Feminism: Time to Ditch Our Prejudice When Faced With Our Privilege
  21. Rape Culture: Summed Up by Somebody Who Actually Has a Decent Insight into the Matter
  22. This Writer Believes That Sex Work Should Be Accepted by Society
  23. But What About The Men?
  24. Private: Breaking Barriers: Women In The LGBT Community
  25. Opposition to Religion on a Feminist Basis – An Old, Tired and Plain Bad Joke
  26. Losing the Lads’ Mags – Are we really losing our sexual liberation?
  27. The Sexist Sell
  28. Private: Coming Out of the Feminist Closet
  29. The Other Side of Feminism
  30. A Journey With Feminism And Depression
  31. Gender Wars – The Internet’s Front Line
  32. Coming out of the Feminist Closet
  33. Meninist…Feminist – Can’t We All Just Agree On Equality?
  34. What Would Quasimodo Say?
  35. ‘Yes Means Yes’ – A Change For Good?
  36. Delhi Gang Rapists: Victims of the Patriarchy?
  37. The One, or One of Many?
  38. The Anti-Misogyny Twitter Bot You Didn’t Know You Wanted Is Here
  39. The Internet Is For Porn
  40. End the Deforestation of the Female Rainforest
  41. Private: Let’s Stop Selfie Shaming
  42. ISIS Sex Slavery: Is Sexual Violence a Necessary Precondition of Conflict?
  43. Celebrities Like Taylor Swift Have Turned Feminism Into A Gimmick
  44. In Defence of 21st Century Feminism
avatar

Discussion1 Comment

  1. avatar

    Yeah, lobbying against lads mags isn’t what gets feminists the ‘feminazi’ tag, it’s when they adopt the language of bigotry and think that they are making reasoned arguments. The easiest way to find out if somebody is a ‘feminazi’, is to take one of their statements and replace all references to men with the words ‘black people’ or ‘jewish people’.

    For example. “Imagine men are a bowl full of M+Ms, one in ten are poison, go ahead and eat a handful” becomes “Imagine Jewish people are M+Ms in a bowl, one in ten are poison, go ahead and eat a handful”

    “No, not all black people are thieves, but yes all white people have to navigate a world in which those who aren’t look exactly like those who are.”

    “#KillAllBlacks”

    These are bigoted statements that demonstrate the dehumanizing language used by some modern feminists. When you can make a statement so obviously offensive simply by changing the subject, then the person who stated it isn’t perhaps the egalitarian they profess themselves to be.

    The only defense I have heard against this is the redefiniton of “sexism” and “racism” into “prejudice against x + power.” You shouldn’t have to redefine words in order to avoid being deemed a bigot.

    Feminazi = Feminism + Bigotry.

Leave A Reply