No Votes for Women?


A hundred years ago, a scheduled General Election was postponed due to the outbreak of the First World War. Had it gone ahead however, the hum of political discussion amongst university students would have sounded distinctly different to how it does today as we approach the final stages in the lead up to this year’s General Election. This was not simply owed to the fact that Britain was in the grips of war, but because Britain was a country within which only half of the population were by law allowed to make a contribution to national-level politics. If this were still the case, nearly 12,000 students at the University of Southampton would be turned away at the polling station on the 7th May, not because they were not registered, but because they are female.

Today women possess equal voting rights. As the centenary of 1918 Representation of the Peoples Act approaches, that people will recount those well-known, heroic tales of the suffragists and suffragettes; footage of Emily Davidson throwing herself under the Kings Horse in 1913, images of Emmeline Pankhurst’s multiple arrests, women and men who put their livelihood and lives on the line for political future of British women, and rightly so.

However, there is one tale that won’t be popping up on our newsfeeds in 2018, that being the story of the women who campaigned against the female parliamentary vote at the beginning of the twentieth century. It’s a narrative which has been consciously forgotten in British history, perhaps because women actively campaigning against their own enfranchisement doesn’t have quite the empowering or heartening effect as the popular images of suffragettes locked behind bars. To the majority today, the concept may appear incredibly contradictory, perhaps a little ludicrous.

The existence of the Men’s National League for Opposing Women’s Enfranchisement, led by diplomat and colonial administrator Lord Cromer is unsurprising a large proportional of Edwardian men were against Women’s suffrage. In 1910, struggling to gain mass-support, the organization merged with its female equivalent to form the National League for Opposing Women’s Suffrage, with a female figurehead. The movement drew to a natural close after a number of British women were granted the parliamentary vote in 1918, however cracks had started to show in the supposedly amalgamated league from the start. There was clear gender division within the league, whereby many of the men based their opposition on the belief that women were simply incapable of being trusted in political affairs. A proportion of the women however, including the figurehead, Mrs Humphry Ward, believed that women’s contribution to society extended beyond the domestic sphere, into local level politics and community matters, yet as Ward herself said  “the men who bear the burden [of Britain’s imperial responsibility] ought to be unhampered by the political inexperience of women”.

The point at which the movement begins to appear particularly contradictory is when we take a closer look at the life of Mrs Humphry Ward. This woman was Britain’s best-selling female novelist, selling  over 250,000 copies of one novel within the first few months of publication. Interestingly, she was one of the key advocates for women’s rights to higher education and lastly a philanthropist who was applauded for her work in helping 2,400 disabled children to attend London schools. For these reasons you would think she would be celebrated today as one of the most inspirational women of the past century.

If Ward’s ideals were implemented today – millions of university-educated women be made to keep quiet on May 7th. It is not an ideal that many would be proud to promote in 2015.

This piece was written by Annie Copp, Annekka Patel, Natalie Rowell, Jessica Leach, Connie Burbidge, Poppy Bowers and Kate Roddy.

Feature image by Kathryn Smith. 

More articles in General Election 2015
  1. Labour Party and Business: A Difficult Relationship?
  2. Chameleon Conservative Cameron Shows True Colours
  3. An Election Reflection for a Majority Minority
  4. Mhairi Black: Giving Politics a Makeover
  5. Galloway Threatens Legal Action Over Election Result
  6. Voter Turnout: What The Numbers Tell Us About The 2015 General Election
  7. Looking At The Reaction to the Election Explains its Result
  8. The Polls Were Wrong Because People Lied, it’s That Simple!
  9. Russell Brand “Resigns” from Politics following General Election Result
  10. It’s Not The Cold War Anymore, We Don’t Need a Nuclear Deterrent
  11. The Future of Labour: Who Will Be The Next Leader?
  12. The Future of the Liberal Democrats: Who Will Be the Next Leader?
  13. The Future of UKIP: Who Will Be the Next Leader?
  14. A Tale of Three Ends
  15. The Tory Legacy
  16. If the Party Leaders were characters from Friends…who would you vote for?
  17. The Ten (Well, Six) Commitments: Is Stone Legally Binding?
  18. Tuition Fees: A Hollow Attempt to Pander to the Student Vote?
  19. 6,417 Ed Milligrams – What Do You Actually Vote For?
  20. Boris Johnson to become Gangster Rapper
  21. Political Engagement: The Calm After the Storm
  22. Parliamentary Candidate Interview: Green Party’s John Spottiswoode.
  23. Parliamentary Candidate Interviews: TUSC’s Sue Atkins
  24. Parliamentary Candidate Interview, Independent Candidate Chris Daviss
  25. “I don’t think the Liberal Democrats should be in government just for the sake of it” – An Interview With Nick Clegg
  26. Parliamentary Candidate Interview, TUSC’s Nick Chaffey
  27. Parliamentary Candidate Interview: Conservative’s Jeremy Moulton.
  28. Should Young People Be Made To Vote?
  29. The Nationalist Parties
  30. No Votes for Women?
  31. None of the Political Candidates Ticking Your Box? There is Another Option.
  32. The Other Parties
  33. Liberal Democrats Party Profile
  34. The Green Party
  35. Labour Party Profile
  36. In Defence of the Coalition
  37. Why Labour Should Win the Election But Won’t
  38. The Protest Vote: The Weapon of the Disenfranchised.
  39. Why Young People Must Use Their Vote
  40. An Interview With Natalie Bennett
  41. What Will a Multi-Party System Mean for Britain?
  42. Tuition Fees: Must Try Harder Ed
  43. Science and Policy
  44. This Election is Far Bigger Than Party Politics
  45. Parliamentary Candidate Interviews: Ian Callaghan, Green Party
  46. Parliamentary Candidate Interviews: Lib Dem’s Adrian Ford
  47. Paliamentary Candidate Interview – Labour’s Darren Paffey
  48. Parliamentary Candidates Interviews: Lib Dem’s Eleanor Bell
  49. TV Debates: The Crucifixion of David Cameron
  50. Parliamentary Candidate Interview – Labour’s Rowenna Davis
  51. Parliamentary Candidate Interview, the Green Party’s Angela Mawle
  52. Can We Trust Politicians Who Act Like Schoolchildren?
  53. Parliamentary Candidate Interview – UKIP’s Sandra James
  54. Manifesto Focus: Labour
  55. Why Nuclear Weapons Are Imperative For The UK’s Security
  56. Southampton’s Role in the General Election Should Not Be Overshadowed by a Sausage Roll
  57. Just When You Thought UKIP Couldn’t Do Anything Right…
  58. What the Hell Do You Want?
  59. Which Political Leader Are You?
  60. The EU: To Be or Not To Be
  61. Your 2015 General Election Candidates
  62. What a Silly Sausage: Southampton UKIP Candidate Accused of Bribery
  63. UKIP Party Profile
  64. Conservative Party Profile
  65. The Leaders Debate: The Insurgents, The Pretender & The Incumbent
  66. SUPA’s Short and Sweet Guide to Voting on 7th May
  67. TV Debate: Clash of the Titans
  68. Leaders Debate Brings Hope For Progressive Politics
  69. TV Debates: David Cameron and Ed Miliband Versus Britain
  70. 14,000 Voters Missing From Electoral Role in Southampton – Register to Vote Now!
  71. Men’s Rights Party Set To Contest in General Elections
  72. A Royal Coup? – Queen Guitarist Brian May Considering Standing for Election
  73. Debating Over Debates
  74. Galloway Demands Inclusion in TV Debates
  75. The General Election 2015 – A Disunited Kingdom? 
  76. 99 Days To Go: The Most Unpredictable Election Yet!
  77. Poll Indicates Demand for Green Party to be Included in Election Debates
  78. Have You Registered To Vote?
  79. Is Sol Campbell running for Parliament?
  80. Salmond to Stand as MP
  81. Students May Hold the Key!
  82. The Green Party Should Not Be Included in the 2015 General Election Debates
  83. Parliamentary Candidate Interview: Alan Whitehead MP
  84. What’s at Stake for Students in the General Election?
  85. It’s Time For Politicians To Get Down With The Kids
  86. The Debates Debate
  87. Who Will Run The Country in 2015?
  88. New Year, New Government? New Politics?
  89. Newly Elected Itchen MP Accused of Helping UKIP Secure Labour Votes

Discussion1 Comment

  1. avatar

    “Britain was a country within which only half of the population were by law allowed to make a contribution to national-level politics.”

    This fails to take into account the fact that 40% of men couldn’t vote until the same Representation of the People act that granted women the vote in 1918. When you say 50% of the population could vote it makes it sound like all men had the vote, which just isn’t true.

    One of the reason many women opposed being given the right to vote throughout the 19th and early 20th century was due to the fact that the expansion of the franchise had always been tied to national service, and that many women were concerned that being included in the vote could lead to their inclusion in any future draft. So when Ward referred to the “the men who bear the burden [of Britain’s imperial responsibility]” she was acknowledging the fact that the vote had always come at a heavy cost. The eventual 1918 act came at the cost of 700000 male lives and had basically nothing to do with over-privileged domestic terrorists.

    Interestingly, the Tories had been trying to give women the vote for decades before the RTP Act 1918, but it had always been blocked by the Liberals. This was due to the fact that as only landowners could vote, the Liberals realized that giving the vote to the Suffragettes would simply be an extra few million Tory votes. Both sides wanted women to have the vote, but any act was locked from getting through parliament until all people could be given the vote.

    There were many female and male suffragists at the start of the 20th century who held to the ideal of votes for all, not just the wealthy, and they should be due much more acknowledgment for their work than the Suffragettes get.

Leave A Reply